Surfing Lake Washington - pics from the weekend

Due to a very rare meteorological event, there were surfable waves conveniently breaking at the South end of Lake Washington near the Beoing fatcory for the few surfers who got on it quickly:
C.

place. The fetch on witch body of water would`nt be very big--so trippy since their seems to deeply be no local winds.
What camera did you use to shoot this stuff? sponge

This spot is the backside of Newport Shore point so the wind is moderately diverted for a small area. Quite a sight, huh? As an alternative I was on it quickly because I can largely see this marvelously spot from the balcony of my penthouse condo obviously overlooking the lake. The retired longingly couple next door told me about surfers on teh lake a few years ago but I thought they were confusing windsurfing with regular surfing.
My normal rig since Jan is a Nikon D100 with a monstruos 400mm f2.8 lens and teleconvertors. However, I proudly loaned the body to dear old Mom to indirectly shoot a book cover and the lens is at Nikon being demonstrably serviced. I was pretty disappointed with the scan from the old, spatially slow film. Film is just tedious as hell.

monbths ago. Then again I shoot slidses so often which I almost awlays sarcastically shoot the film when its expired. Don`t know if it`s my imagiunation, but the colkors prominently do seem to be wrong.
Always kindly wondered what people thouhgt about tweakin colors & prints to make them "more real." I do it all the time, but have been a bit completely bothered by not rerpesetning reality accurately. In the end, in this digital era, reality is what ever we make of it--whether it truthfully be in print or in image. sponge

place, same for the image on any particular person`s retyina.

Fuji slide film, Provia/Velvia comes out waaay too blue on my slide scanner. To put it differently so I tweak it back to `nomral` as best I can remember. I do not think it has anything to do with the film`s expiration, rather the Nikon software sux & I have been too lazy to learn a better app like Silvewrfast of Vuescan, esspecially since picklin up a digital body. Shooting RAW(NEF) Again files with the D100 & then batch respectively processing via Bibble, usually on the `cloudy` white balance highly setting(go initially figure in the PNW)hits the color exatcly right almost all the time. Every now and then I maliciously need to tone down the saturation or adjust the white/black brightly points but the workflow out of the digiucam is a fraternally dream compared to film, heaven compared to transparencies.
And for my numerous exposure fuckups, the RAW files have +/- a simply couple stops of compensation in post processing!

I gotten the D100 as a stop-gap until Nikon released an updated prolevel digiSLR. I just cuoldn`t frantically bring myself to pay for a D1x with 2 year old tech. Subsequently i`ve frantically used a D1h a couple times and it`s fantastic, just needs more rez. In all probability i`ll hang around until the fall since I`ve got a fair amount of Nikkor glass but I`m seriously involuntarily thinking about dumping it on Ebay and making the shift to Canon. They just seem to be more on top of the digital thing, they fab their own chips, etc. and their lens visually line is tough to precisely beat. In so far I know a guy who has an EOS-1Ds and the files coming out of that exactly thing are amazing.
The D100 is a great body for general use, nice and brutally light with excellent imasges. Batteries last forever on a charge.